Gearmotor Selection: Gearbox Reducer Housing Materials

Wednesday - 09/10/2019 23:41

Gearmotor Selection: Gearbox Reducer Housing Materials

Shafts, bearings, seals, gears, oil/grease: all essential components to the successful operation of a fractional horsepower gearmotor. While these are considered the “working components” of a gearbox reducer, one vital part remains that has the duty of holding them all together: the reducer housing.
  Focus should be given the reducer housing design, so the best material and technology is chosen for a particular application.

Billet aluminum

Available in a variety of two dimensional extruded shapes including rounds, hexagons, squares and rectangles, billet aluminum is commonly used in the prototyping process or when annual part usage is low.  Billet aluminum has a high degree of machining flexibility, but requires much more machining than a cast aluminum part.

Pros: flexible machining options for prototypes and low volume parts; short lead times as no tooling is required; high dimensional accuracy due to the machining of all features; no internal porosity that could cause lubrication leaks; no upfront tooling cost; unlike castings, no draft is required on any of the part features.

Cons: high cost of material and labor due to increased machining and the inability to core out unused areas; part weight likely to be higher.

Sand cast aluminum

As the name implies, a single use sand mold (that is later recycled into new molds) is required for the sand casting process.  While aluminum is typically used for gearbox reducers, several other materials can be sand cast such as iron, bronze and brass.  Sand casting has a high degree of part design flexibility with a low tooling investment.  The cast features, however, have a low degree of precision that require increased machining stock during the casting process.

Pros: flexible casting design options to reduce material and weight; low internal porosity; low tooling investment ($3000 – $10,000); good for low volumes.
dau giam toc dl

Cons: high surface roughness; at least 1/16” machining stock required to true up critical features; more challenging to fixture during machining process; higher part cost than other casting processes.

Permanent mold aluminum casting

Instead of using a sand mold that is used once; permanent mold aluminum casting uses a reusable mold produced from metal.  While part complexity may not be quite as high as sand casting, permanent mold casting is conducive for slightly higher part usage to lower the piece price.

Pros: good for mid to high volumes as piece price is less than sand casting; improved surface finish over sand casting; low internal porosity; less machining stock required versus sand casting.

Cons: part size and geometry more limited than sand casting; higher tooling cost ($5,000 – $20,000) than sand casting (but lower than other casting technologies).

Die casting aluminum or zinc

When in need of a gearbox reducer housing that has a high annual usage, die cast aluminum or zinc may be the answer.  Die casting can produce parts with thinner wall sections, tighter tolerances and smoother surface finishes than both sand or permanent mold castings.  The piece price is also less, but the dies (castings) are much more expensive making this process suitable for high volumes.

Pros: tighter tolerances, smoother surface finishes and thinner wall sections than sand or permanent mold casting; low piece price suitable for high volumes; long die life (100,000+ shots).

Cons: expensive (~$20,000+) die tooling making die casting not as suitable for low volumes; high internal porosity limiting the amount of machining stock as leak paths may occur.

Magnesium injection molding (thixomolding)

Capable of producing parts to tolerances that may not need any post machining, magnesium injection molding may be a good solution for very high volume, high precision reducer housings.  Wall sections even thinner and less porous than die casting can be achieved.  However, due to very expensive tooling costs, magnesium injection molding is not usually suitable for low volume parts.

Pros: tighter tolerances and thinner wall sections than die casting; suitable for high volumes; very light part weight; long die life (150,000 – 500,000 shots); magnesium can still be machined if even tighter tolerances are needed.

Cons: extremely expensive (~$100,000+) tooling cost making magnesium injection molding likely not suitable for low or even mid-range volumes.

While the technologies listed above are commonly used for various types of fractional horsepower reducer housings, several variations of these technologies exists along with completely different technologies.  

Dolin has experience with the housing technologies mentioned and can tap into the experience of its diverse supply source to design and create a gearbox reducer housing that will meet the requirements of virtually any application.

Total notes of this article: 9890 in 3671 rating